Journal of Legal Research by ILRF · Vol. 1, Issue 3 (May 2026)
Rethinking the Presumption of Legitimacy under Section 116 BSA,2023, in Light of “Nikhat Parveen @ Khusboo Khatoon v. Rafique @ Shillu (2026 INSC 399)”: A Case Comment
Harshit Rathore & Akanksha Saroha
Abstract
This case comment examines the Supreme Court's decision in Nikhat Parveen @ Khusboo Khatoon v. Rafique @ Shillu (2026 INSC 399), addressing whether a consented and unchallenged DNA test report can rebut the presumption of legitimacy under Section 116 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. The case arose from a domestic violence complaint under Section 12 of the DV Act, 2005, where the respondent sought and obtained a DNA test that excluded him as the biological father, thereby denying maintenance to the child. Employing doctrinal analysis and reviewing precedents, the comment critically evaluates the Court's finding that a finalised, consented DNA report prevails over a statutory presumption.
Article Information
- Journal
- Journal of Legal Research by ILRF
- ISSN
- 3139-7107 (Online)
- Volume
- 1 (I)
- Issue
- 3 — May 2026
- Length
- 9 Pages
- Published
- 10 July 2026
- Publisher
- India Legal Research Foundation
- DOI
- Not yet assigned
How to Cite
Harshit Rathore & Akanksha Saroha, “Rethinking the Presumption of Legitimacy under Section 116 BSA,2023, in Light of “Nikhat Parveen @ Khusboo Khatoon v. Rafique @ Shillu (2026 INSC 399)”: A Case Comment”, Journal of Legal Research by ILRF, Vol. 1, Issue 3 (May 2026), ISSN 3139-7107.
