Journal of Legal Research by ILRF · Vol. 1, Issue 8 (October 2026)
Unconscionability in Franchise Agreements: Rethinking the Commercial Parties Exception in Indian Contract
Priyanka Ingalgi & Ananya Rana | 2nd Year, B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) | Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai
Abstract
Criticises the 'commercial parties' exception to unconscionability (Brojo Nath, S.K. Jain, ICOMM) as it applies to take-it-or-leave-it franchise agreements. It uses the Reebok India and Subway disputes and a US/UK/Australia/France comparison, and concludes that franchisees in India have no remedy. It proposes a short statute with pre-contract disclosure, a fairness test for standard-form clauses, and an enforcement authority.
Article Information
- Journal
- Journal of Legal Research by ILRF
- ISSN
- 3139-7107 (Online)
- Volume
- 1 (I)
- Issue
- 8 — October 2026
- Length
- 8 Pages
- Published
- 2 November 2026
- Publisher
- India Legal Research Foundation
- DOI
- Not yet assigned
How to Cite
Priyanka Ingalgi & Ananya Rana, “Unconscionability in Franchise Agreements: Rethinking the Commercial Parties Exception in Indian Contract”, Journal of Legal Research by ILRF, Vol. 1, Issue 8 (October 2026), ISSN 3139-7107.
